Land boundary dispute: opponent's claimed line rejected
A neighboring landowner sought to fix the boundary based on a map app, but the court set the boundary according to the official survey and ordered the opponent to bear the litigation costs.
How the case unfolded
Background
The opposing party (the plaintiff) sued to fix the boundary between their land and the land of our client's side (the defendants). The local government had carried out boundary restoration surveys several times, but the plaintiff kept objecting to the results.
Issues and ruling
The plaintiff argued that the line shown on a mobile map app was the true boundary. The court determined the boundary based on the survey appraisal by a public surveying agency and related fact-finding replies, and rejected the plaintiff's claims that the map app line was correct or that the survey was flawed.
Outcome
The boundary was fixed along the line found by the court-ordered survey, and the plaintiff was ordered to bear all litigation costs.
This is the outcome of an individual case and does not guarantee the same result in similar matters. Some facts have been generalized to protect the parties involved.
Related practice and case
See the practice area and another success story from the same field.
Tell us what is happening first
Leave an inquiry and we will explain how to proceed after reviewing it. If it is urgent, please call 1577-0448.